請問repeater跟universal repeater差別在那?

請問關於WiFi路由器的repeater跟universal repeater差別在那?
網路上偶然看到的東西,Google了下,感覺是差不多的東西,但好像又有差別?
有人知道這2項技術差別在哪嗎?
還是都一樣的?
把某個WiFi訊號再轉發出去的都算wireless repeater
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_repeater
A wireless repeater (also called wireless range extender) takes an existing signal from a wireless router or wireless access point and rebroadcasts it to create a second network. When two or more hosts have to be connected with one another over the IEEE 802.11 protocol and the distance is too long for a direct connection to be established, a wireless repeater is used to bridge the gap.

很早以前大多利用WDS來做repeating這件事
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_distribution_system
Technical
WDS may provide two modes of access point-to-access point (AP-to-AP) connectivity:
●Wireless bridging, in which WDS APs (AP-to-AP on sitecom routers AP) communicate only with each other and don't allow wireless stations (STA) (also known as wireless clients) to access them
●Wireless repeating, in which APs (WDS on sitecom routers) communicate with each other and with wireless STAs

但WDS限制比較多,例如要兩台AP互設對方MAC
這兩台AP通常要相同廠牌(或相同韌體如dd-wrt)比較好

後來才比較流行改成universal repeater
只需要第二台AP設定成第一台AP的client端即可
(因此第一台AP不是自己能管理的機器亦無妨)
且這種方式也比較能跟不同廠牌的機器相容

蝦米爸爸 wrote:
把某個WiFi訊號...(恕刪)

那可問下universal repeater模式
是否有跟Repeater一樣會速度砍半問題?
kis_987_654 wrote:
那可問下universal repeater模式
是否有跟Repeater一樣會速度砍半問題?

第一個連結就有寫了
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_repeater
Drawbacks
Since only one wireless device can transmit at once, wireless transmissions are doubled (router to repeater and then repeater to client versus just router to client), and so:
●Wireless throughput is reduced by at least 50%.
●Wireless interference (e.g., with other networks on the same channel) is at least doubled.
●Potentially opens another security attack vector. Older devices don't always support WPA2-PSK so while the original network might be secure, the secondary one is potentially open.


蝦米爸爸 wrote:
第一個連結就有寫了https...(恕刪)

看來一樣都會砍半
感謝解答
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!