kch008 wrote:
呵呵 原始碼都被copy了 還能跟對方和解??
那時美國國力如日中天
CISCO 有這麼軟嗎? CISCO 律師有這麼廢嗎?
隨便一下就全球禁售了 天價罰款就來了
單工程違約金 就賠不完了
有些東西 用膝蓋想想也知道?
你是不相信華為有侵權嗎?
智慧財產權的官司,不外乎要阻止對方持續侵權,再向對方取得賠款.
Cisco沒有軟,Cisco的律師也沒有廢.
華為被勒令更改Cisco所指定的軟體組成,也被勒令賠款給Cisco.
舊聞是需要用google才知道,不是在家裡用膝蓋就想得出來.
賠償金額保密,無從得知.
但是華為侵權已經是鐵的事實.
華為沒有侵權的話,還需要被勒令更改Cisco指定的軟體?
華為沒有侵權的話,還需要立刻停售沒有修改過軟體的產品?
華為只能銷售Cisco勒令更改過軟體的新網路產品,這不是鐵證嗎?
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-07/30/content_353070.htm
Huawei, Cisco settle IPR dispute
(China Daily/Agencies)
Updated: 2004-07-30 00:41
Networking giant Cisco Systems Inc has agreed to settle a lawsuit with Chinese rival Huawei Technologies Co.
Under the deal announced on Wednesday, which finalizes a tentative agreement reached in October, Huawei will revise its command-line interface, user manuals, help screens and some source code to address Cisco's concerns on routers and switches. Financial terms were not disclosed, though each party must pay its own legal fees.
"The completion of this lawsuit marks a victory for the protection of intellectual property rights," said Mark Chandler, Cisco's general counsel. "We are pleased to conclude the litigation as a result of the steps that were taken to address our concerns."
Stanley Young, an attorney representing Huawei, said his client welcomed the final resolution to the case.
"Huawei certainly looks forward to competing in the marketplace on its merits," he said.
"We are very satisfied with the result, which shows that Huawei Techonogies is worthy of trust by our customers," Huawei Technologies spokesman Fu Jun said in Shenzhen Thursday in an telephone interview with China Daily.
"Hua Wei has always respected and protected intellectual property rights, investing heavily on product research and development," Fu added. "Before the lawsuit, Huawei had already taken initiatives to amend our controversial products to avoid further disputes and enhance our competitiveness in a bid to further explore the overseas market."
Fu also said the case didn't affect Huawei's business in the international market, which has seen a rapid increases in recent years.
The Shenzhen-based Huawei is trying to jump into the corporate router and switch market that Cisco dominates.
Last year, Huawei and 3Com Corp announced a joint venture to develop and manufacture enterprise-class networking equipment.
The lawsuit, originally filed in January 2003 at the US District Court in Marshall, Texas, claimed Huawei and two US-based subsidiaries not only copied protected parts of Cisco technology but also infringed on at least five patents.
In September, the companies announced a six-month stay in the lawsuit pending a third-party review of Huawei's products. That was extended in April.
At the time, Huawei had already discontinued the sale of products in contention and agreed to sell only new and modified equipment. It also agreed to submit units for review by a neutral expert.
https://businesstech.co.za/news/hardware/24111/cisco-explains-huawei-drop/
Cisco said it was now releasing parts of an expert’s report in a blog by Mark Chandler, general counsel at Cisco, “so the world could learn what really happened.”
In the segments released it said that “the exactness of the comments and spacing not only indicate that Huawei has access to the Cisco code but that the Cisco code was electronically copied and inserted into (Huawei’s code).”
