個人積分：17698分
文章編號：60381053
個人積分：145分
文章編號：60381086
求仁得仁 wrote:
美國國家毒理部旗下科學家的結論是肯定的。
樓主第一段文章來源:
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055699.full.pdf
第二段的文章來源:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/cellphone-cancer-link-found-in-government-study-1464324146
第三方美國科學人文章:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/
從第二來源:The study was conducted in an underground lab with 21 specially designed radio-frequency chambers to house mice and rats. More than 2,500 rats and mice were exposed to radio-frequency energy in various intervals over two years.
The study explored effects from the most common type of wireless technologies, GSM and CDMA, at two common frequencies, 900 megahertz for rats and 1900 megahertz for mice. It exposed the rats to the frequencies every 10 minutes followed by a 10-minute break for 18 hours, resulting in nine hours a day of exposure.
Results from the study on mice weren’t released.
第三來源:They chronically exposed rodents to carefully calibrated radio-frequency (RF) radiation levels designed to roughly emulate what humans with heavy cell phone use or exposure could theoretically experience in their daily lives. The animals were placed in specially built chambers that dosed their whole bodies with varying amounts and types of this radiation for approximately nine hours per day throughout their two-year life spans. “This is by far—far and away—the most carefully done cell phone bioassay, a biological assessment. This is a classic study that is done for trying to understand cancers in humans,” says Christopher Portier, a retired head of the NTP who helped launch the study and still sometimes works for the federal government as a consultant scientist. “There will have to be a lot of work after this to assess if it causes problems in humans, but the fact that you can do it in rats will be a big issue. It actually has me concerned, and I’m an expert.”
這兩段可以互相證實對大鼠做每日18小時的全身曝曬，且以10分鐘為間隔。文章裡有提到:Rats were exposed to GSM- or CDMA-modulated RFR at 900 MHz with whole-body SAR exposures of 0, 1.5, 3, or 6 W/kg.儘管實驗設置裡面有提到他們盡可能的以SAR標準來衡量，但是每種動物對日常輻射的修復能力不同。此文章也只是提供一個基底給更多人去作驗證還有探討。
另外，請諒解小弟無餘暇去讀完全部的文章，但是如果要證實日常用的手機或無線訊號會對人產生相同的引響，
從第二來源:
“Given the widespread global usage of mobile communications among users of all ages, even a very small increase in the incidence of disease resulting from exposure to [radio-frequency radiation] could have broad implications for public health,”
還有
"Where people were saying there’s no risk, I think this ends that kind of statement,"
是的，用膝蓋想也知道有風險、關聯，但是到底有多少風險和關聯呢?這篇研究報告做了兩年，也有一些結果，但是從他的conclution後也有接續要做的東西，有興趣的可以直接從"conclutions"後開始看，畢竟從華爾街日報所說"$25 million study"，這樣就花25百萬美元也說不過去。
非學術的期刊或是報紙只能當作索引，就算是"先進列強"也一樣會有殺人標題，會回文也只是很懷疑樓主的第二段話怎麼來的，順道看一下是否有新的鐵證。恩...還有那個甚麼金屬殼的一大理由...
http://highscope.ch.ntu.edu.tw/wordpress/?p=29538
個人積分：103分
文章編號：60381137
個人積分：169分
文章編號：60381194
個人積分：9分
文章編號：60381199
個人積分：1分
文章編號：60381239
個人積分：254分
文章編號：60381262
個人積分：1分
文章編號：60381277
個人積分：11分
文章編號：60381304
個人積分：2101分
文章編號：60381322
關閉廣告