Night Rin wrote:
命是自己的,自己把自己顧好就好,不要跟**吵架
**之所以是**,就是因為他只會聽自己想聽的話...(恕刪)
現在不是要討論數據嗎?
個人積分：14分
文章編號：40898130
個人積分：14分
文章編號：40898175
個人積分：114分
文章編號：40922254
個人積分：183分
文章編號：40934021
wu91125 wrote:
這幾天好多全罩不安全...(恕刪)
46. The most deadly injuries to the accident victims were injuries to the chest and head.
47. The use of the safety helmet is the single critical factor in the prevention of reduction of head injury; the safety helmet which complies with FMVSS 218 is a significantly effective injury countermeasure.
48. Safety helmet use caused no attenuation of critical traffic sounds, no limitation of precrash visual field, and no fatigue or loss of attention; no element of accident causation was related to helmet use.
49. FMVSS 218 provides a high level of protection in traffic accidents, and needs modification only to increase coverage at the back of the head and demonstrate impact protection of the front of full facial coverage helmets, and insure all adult sizes for traffic use are covered by the standard.
50. Helmeted riders and passengers showed significantly lower head and neck injury for all types of injury, at all levels of injury severity.
51. The increased coverage of the full facial coverage helmet increases protection, and significantly reduces face injuries.
52. There is no liability for neck injury by wearing a safety helmet; helmeted riders had less neck injuries than unhelmeted riders. Only four minor injuries were attributable to helmet use, and in each case the helmet prevented possible critical or fatal head injury.
53. Sixty percent of the motorcyclists were not wearing safety helmets at the time of the accident. Of this group, 26% said they did not wear helmets because they were uncomfortable and inconvenient, and 53% simply had no expectation of accident involvement.
http://www.clarity.net/adam/hurt-report.html
瓜皮和全罩哪個安全 用常識判斷就好了 大家自己覺得哪個安全就帶哪個就好了 時間是我們的老師
ps.有人知道什麼是達爾文獎嘛?
個人積分：97分
文章編號：40942195
個人積分：322分
文章編號：40943917
個人積分：6分
文章編號：40970529
反正讓喜歡戴瓜皮的人都滅絕了就沒問題啦
每個戴瓜皮的都覺得"哇～我好輕便，騎車閃躲率+100%、感知危機能力UP!!"
如果真的是這樣就會有一堆"今天我戴半罩出門差點出車禍，好險我帶的是半罩，不然我就完了"
而不是現在大家都說"我今天出了車禍，好險我戴全罩，不然我就完了"
一定會有人說"可是半罩是沒出事阿，人家全罩出車禍了"
試問，有多少人戴半罩出車禍而死亡，又有多少戴全罩騎車卻沒死呢?
我平常出門都是戴全罩，但是這次跨年被迫帶了半罩(租車店沒得選)
那兩天真的是讓我心驚膽跳的(因為很沒安全感)
說真的，看一下儀表板和後照鏡沒有這麼容易出車禍的
只要看之前先注意一下路況就好，反正看儀表板和後照鏡不花太多時間
總比用聽的或是用瞄的好
個人積分：14分
文章編號：40980369
個人積分：46分
文章編號：41076186
Night Rin wrote:
那些會說"可是半罩是...(恕刪)
那些人根本死鴨子嘴硬,就樓主找出的資料來看~~
""二百四十位有頭部傷害的機車事故傷患、與二八三名沒有發生頭部傷害的機車事故傷患，並比較兩組人所配戴的安全帽是否有所差異
。二百四十名有發生頭部傷害的騎士中，十三位沒有戴安全帽，十一位配戴「全頂連下顎式」安全帽，六十五人配戴「全頂不連下顎式」安全帽。而高達六成二的傷患，也就是一百五十人戴的是「半頂」、俗稱「西瓜皮」的安全帽，高於對照組的"五成"。""
依照上面有些人指出,3/4比全罩還不容易出車禍,但是又有人指出瓜帽更不容易出事,
因為視野更好,對外界的敏感度更好
但是請看紅字的部分,有沒有看清楚,"高於對照組的五成"
這就表示對照組二八三位中有一四一位因為戴瓜帽而出車禍
在講仔細一點~~
二百四十位頭部外傷的有一百五十人戴瓜帽
對照組---二百八十三位 頭部以外受傷的有一百四十一位(五成)
隨便的一組都超過五成...瓜帽出事率還真高啊?
自己的頭都不顧的人,還會專心的特別去騎車嗎?
關閉廣告